Originally written by Rozanne Andersen in November 2023. Revised and expanded by Angie Erwin in March 2026.

In September of 2023, the CFPB spotlighted consumer reporting risks, noting a surge in complaints, especially around accuracy and report misuse. That focus hasn’t gone away.  If anything, enforcement and rulemaking made the stakes clearer for data furnishers and third-party collectors.

As complaint volumes continue to rise (as of June 30, 2025, the CFPB received more than 5.6 million complaints), data furnishers need to provide accurate information to Credit Reporting Agencies (CRAs) and ensure that they are properly handling consumer disputes.

Why many collectors stopped furnishing — and what to do if you still do

The risk hasn’t changed: if you furnish, you must be able to investigate reasonably, suppress when required, and notify consumers correctly, or you risk FCRA/Reg V exposure.

Meanwhile, FDCPA/Reg F dispute handling has its own triggers and timing. Getting the frivolous (FCRA) vs. duplicative (FDCPA) distinction right keeps you from overspending on investigations you don’t owe and from skipping the ones you do.

Quick refresher: FCRA frivolous or irrelevant disputes (Regulation V, §1022.43)

Scope: Applies to all data furnishers. The furnisher must conduct a reasonable investigation unless an exception applies or the dispute is deemed frivolous or irrelevant.

A direct dispute can be deemed frivolous or irrelevant if it:

• Isn’t in writing
• Lacks the minimum elements of a direct dispute
• Fails to provide sufficient information for investigation; or
• Is substantially the same as a prior written, direct dispute or an indirect (E-OSCAR dispute routed through a CRA) already investigated and answered by the furnisher.

Seven exceptions where investigation is not required — when the dispute pertains to:

1. The Consumer’s demographic information
2. The identity of past or present employers
3. A request for a Consumer report
4. Information derived from public records, such as judgements, bankruptcies, liens, and other legal matters
5. Information related to fraud alerts or active-duty alerts
6. Information provided to a Consumer reporting agency by another furnisher; or
7. The furnisher has a reasonable belief that the direct dispute is submitted by, is prepared on behalf of the Consumer by, or is submitted on a form supplied to the Consumer by a credit repair organization.

There is No limit on the length of time a Consumer must file a Direct Dispute directly with the data furnisher. So long as the party that reported the account to the credit reporting agency is the data furnisher of record, the data furnisher that reported the account is responsible for investigating the dispute unless:

• the data furnisher can declare the Direct Dispute to be a Frivolous or Irrelevant dispute; or
• the dispute falls subject to one of the exceptions listed above.

Notice of Determination (must send within 5 business days):

There is a caveat to declaring a dispute Frivolous or Irrelevant.  If you deem a dispute frivolous/irrelevant or it falls in an exception, you must notify the consumer within five business days of the determination.  The Notice of Determination must:

• Be provided to the Consumer not later than five business days after determining a dispute is Frivolous or Irrelevant
• Include the reasons for the decision
• Identify any additional information needed to investigate the disputed information
• Be provided by mail or if authorized by the Consumer, by any other means available to the furnisher.

Also remember: furnishers must maintain reasonable written policies and procedures to ensure accuracy and integrity.

 

Get up to speed on collections compliance. Explore Angie Erwin’s Compliance Bytes video library for fast, practical guidance on statute of limitation, E-Sign consent, emerging AI trends, and more. Watch the videos here.

Quick refresher: FDCPA duplicative dispute (Regulation F, §1006.38 and §1006.42)

Scope: Applies to third-party debt collectors.   The FDCPA requires third-party debt collectors, among other duties, to investigate a dispute, unless the debt collector has declared the dispute as duplicative.

A duplicative dispute means a dispute that has been submitted by the Consumer in writing within the Validation Period that

• Is substantially the same as a previously submitted dispute by the Consumer in writing within the validation period for which the debt collector has previously investigated and responded to; and
• does not include new and material information to support the dispute.

If you determine the dispute is duplicative, you can either:

1. Notify the consumer in writing (mail) or electronically (with E-SIGN consent) that the dispute is duplicative, state why, and refer to your prior response; or
2. Cease communication until you send a copy of the verification information or the name of the original creditor

Important delivery nuance: When you send duplicative dispute notices electronically, Reg F requires compliance with E SIGN §101(c); and all required electronic disclosures must be sent in a manner reasonably expected to provide actual notice and that the consumer can retain. 

Side by side: Frivolous (FCRA) vs. Duplicative (FDCPA)

Operational guardrails

Triage your Disputes.

Be able to distinguish the type of dispute you are addressing, FCRA or FDCPA, and route it to the appropriate team.  Mislabeling and Misrouting are root causes of inaccuracy and missed deadlines.

Document the “why.”

If you tag a dispute as frivolous/irrelevant (or an exception), log the specific reason and send the notice within 5 business days stating reasons and any additional information needed. (Reg V §1022.43(e).)

If you tag a dispute as duplicative, record which prior dispute you rely on and either send the duplicative notice (with reasons and reference to your prior response) or cease collections until verification goes out. (Reg F §1006.38(c)–(d).)

Mind the medium.

If you deliver FDCPA/Reg F notices electronically, ensure that you have E-SIGN consent, and that the message is reasonably expected to provide actual notice and can be retained. (Reg F §1006.42)

Stay flexible on guidance.

Several CFPB advisory opinions (including January 2024 FCRA items) have been withdrawn.  Check current guidance to ensure that you are reporting disputes accurately.

Bottom line

Investigations of disputes can be time consuming and labor intensive. Therefore, knowing when an FDCPA or an FCRA dispute must be investigated and when it does not require an investigation is critical to the accuracy of reporting and the associated cost.

Sources

• Regulation V (FCRA) – Direct Disputes & Furnisher Duties: 12 C.F.R. §1022.43; §1022.42; Appendix E.
• Regulation F (FDCPA) – Disputes & E-SIGN Delivery: 12 C.F.R. §1006.38; §1006.42.
• Supervisory Focus / Findings: CFPB Supervisory Highlights Spring 2024 and related newsroom release. [files.cons…inance.gov], [consumerfinance.gov]
• Complaint Volume (2024 cycle): Consumer Response Annual Report (2024 activity). [files.cons…inance.gov]

Discover How to Navigate Collections Compliance in the AI Era

Forward thinking teams are reevaluating how AI fits within their compliance and governance strategies. In our white paper The Smartest Collector Isn’t the One You Hire, we examine the benefits, challenges, and responsible use of AI in collections so you can make informed, risk-aware decisions. Get your copy today.